So you’be propbably heard the event of what the press call “fanatics” burning poppy during the Remembrance Day. Of course the Twitter-sphere reacted to it quickly as usual. i think that though this may be subject to controverse, real-time sentiment analysis in this case clearly goes against relativists prejudices.
To sum up the arguments often presented in a nutshell , there are the notions that :
• Media always decide to present extremists muslims because it sells more.
• People with moderate opinions ,that are believed to represent and to form, the majority are left into silence, but would condemn any violent acts if given the chance to speak-out.
Good or bad social media and the internet allows people to broadcast themselves and their opinion. These voices are most of the time lost and drown into the thick stream of information. But when it comes to Social Media with regard to every platform that allow open status updates it is relatively easy to focus and curate people reactions by focusing on certain keywords.
I have used different keywords for this little “experience like :
• muslim poppies
• poppies burning
• muslim against
• poppy burning
You can test these terms on any real time search engine no hashtag really needed.
So at this time if you are monitoring the feed you should have come up with a re-tweet of this particular status update :
But to be honest not much, there is quasi no reaction from the moderate muslim majority on social networks .
Don’t mark my words for it see for yourself on Collecta :
Most of the tweet from the muslims talking about this subject are not here to condemn this act (as most westerners condemned the Qu’ran burning day) but to minimize or justify them :
Or simply to say stop the generalisation and that they should not be stigmatised because of the foolishness of a minority.
There is a lot of problems here the first being the fact that this person do not condemn these acts but says that once again they are the real victims . The real problem being who is she referring too .
What we can learn from all this :
• Generally speaking the muslim online reaction to the poppy burning has been quasi null.
• The most vocal reactions came from people justifying these acts or taking the victimised attitude.
• One of the only voice condemning frankly these acts ( the first tweet that embedded ) has been re-tweeted numerous times in the last 13 hours, But it must be stressed that it has been re-tweeted by non-muslims .
How can we interpret this absence of reactions :
• The basic explanation could be that they simply don’t care
But other controversial or funny explanations can be made :
• Moderate muslims though they form a vast majority are not on the Internet.
• In their great wisdom they refuse to give such foolishness too much importance so they won’t react .
• They don’t voice their opinion because of the fear of retaliation (it could be probable).
Further remarks :
One could ask how can I determine who is not or is not muslim ?
> The answer is simple at 99% muslim have muslim name that they live in North Pole, USA, Nigeria or Indonesia . Some smart-asses could argue that this approximation is not true because it doesn’t take into account the opinion of converts, again when someone converts to Islam he must take an islamic name, one of the most famous case being Mohamed Ali, so this is not a problem at all.
> This empiric “study” have been made using 3 notable social networks :
• Google Buzz
I don’t have statistics about how many users decide to have their Facebook updates published publicly, but it seems this percentage is low. So though I monitored these three networks , the global image is more a reflection of the Twitter sphere opinion.
> With regard to how many muslims actually use social networks to voice their opinion it would be interesting to see how many react to certain event that they find offensive .
Obvious events like :
• South Park Muhammed depiction
• Danish caricatures
• Q’ran burning day
My bet is that they will react in mass to such events .
One may question the seriousness of this little “study” I doesn’t cla